One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorHamidi, Mehmet Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorColak, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:23:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:23:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionColak, Hakan/0000-0001-8262-0913; Bayraktar, Yusuf/0000-0001-6250-5651; Hamidi, Mehmet Mustafa/0000-0003-3461-7925; ERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553
dc.description.abstractAim: In the present study, we evaluated the 1-year clinical performance of a conventional posterior composite resin and three bulk-fill composite resins. Methods: Fifty patients with four class II restorations under occlusion were enrolled in the present study. A total of 200 restorations were placed in the cavity, 50 for each material (Clearfil Photo Posterior, Filtek Bulk-Fill Flowable and Filtek P60, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill, and SonicFill). One operator placed the restorations in the cavity, and 1 week later the patients were called for baseline examination. Two calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations once every 3 months for 1 year, according to United States Public Health Service criteria. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Friedman) were used for the analysis at a confidence level of 95%. Results: The 1-year recall rate was 86%. All restorations showed minor modifications after 1 year. However, no statistically-significant differences were detected between the materials' performance at baseline and after 1 year for all criteria (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The bulk-fill composite resin materials showed similar clinical performance when compared with a conventional posterior composite resin. Further evaluations are necessary for the long-term clinical performance of these materials.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jicd.12210
dc.identifier.issn2041-1618
dc.identifier.issn2041-1626
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26800647
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12210
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6981
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000407264700008
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Investigative And Clinical Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbulk-fill compositeen_US
dc.subjectclass II restorationen_US
dc.subjectclinical evaluationen_US
dc.subjectclinical performanceen_US
dc.subjectposterior compositeen_US
dc.titleOne-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill compositesen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites.pdf
Boyut:
77.97 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu