Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Erdal | |
dc.contributor.author | Batislam, Ertan | |
dc.contributor.author | Başar, Murad | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuğlu, Devrim | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuvanc, Ercan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-25T17:43:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-25T17:43:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.description | Batislam, Ertan/0000-0002-7493-4573; | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives. To evaluate the analgesic effect and utility of prilocaine infiltration alone for minimal morbidity during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Methods. A total of 114 patients with kidney stones, aged 18 to 69 years, were randomly separated into two groups. The 58 patients in group 1 received intramuscular diclophenac 30 minutes before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and the 56 patients in group 2 received prilocaine infiltration into the 30 cm(2) area below the 12th rib right before the session. A visual analog scale (0 to 100 mm) was used to evaluate pain. Results. The visual analog scale scores for group 2 were statistically lower at 1, 10, and 20 minutes compared with the scores for group 1 (P = 0.006, P = 0.005, and P = 0.006, respectively). However, no difference was detected at the end of the procedure. The requirement for additional analgesic was less in group 2 (P = 0.007). Conclusions. Prilocaine infiltration alone can be used for analgesic purposes efficiently and safely during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with minimal morbidity. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | closedAccess | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.047 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-4295 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16806420 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-33745867301 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.047 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/3760 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000239348400006 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Urology | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? | en_US |
dc.type | Article |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
- İsim:
- Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.pdf
- Boyut:
- 95.73 KB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Tam Metin/Full Text