Comparison of electromagnetic field stimulation on the healing of small and large intestinal anastomoses

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorNaycı, A.
dc.contributor.authorÇakmak, M.
dc.contributor.authorAksoyek, S.
dc.contributor.authorRenda, N.
dc.contributor.authorYücesan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:34:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:34:50Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionNayci, Ali/0000-0002-0534-1205
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Magnetic fields have been shown to affect biologic processes. Accordingly, an experimental study was designed to investigate the effect of electromagnetic field stimulation on intestinal healing and to compare small and large intestinal anastomoses. METHODS: An ileal or a colonic anastomosis was constructed in rats. Beginning the day after surgery, randomly assigned groups were exposed to sinusoidal electromagnetic field stimulation of 10.76-mT intensity and 50-Hz frequency, with 2-hour-on/10-hour-off cycles. After seven days, intestinal anastomoses were assessed for hydroxyproline content and breaking strength. Statistical comparison between each experimental and control group yielded significance (P < 0.05) in all cases. RESULTS: Hydroxyproline content increased significantly in ileum from 1.650 +/- 0.11 (mean standard error of the mean) to 2.036 +/- 0.11 <mu>g/mg (P = 0.0249) and in colon from 1.526 +/- 0.11 to 1.922 +/- 0.11 mug/mg (P = 0.0135). Breaking strength also increased significantly in ileum from 0.213 +/- 0.01 to 0.255 +/- 0.01 MPa (P = 0.001) and in colon from 0.227 +/- 0.01 to 0.270 +/- 0.01 MPa (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic field stimulation provided a significant gain in anastomotic healing in both small and large intestine. There were no apparent differences detected between the healing of small and large intestinal anastomoses except for slight differences in the tune sequences of events and magnitude. The study demonstrated a significant increase in both biochemical and mechanical parameters. Additional investigations are needed to determine optimal conditions and promote selective biologic responses.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF02234642
dc.identifier.endpage1188en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11535860
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034881978
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1181en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234642
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2915
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000170453000023
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiseases Of The Colon & Rectum
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectelectromagnetic fielden_US
dc.subjectintestineen_US
dc.subjectileal anastomosesen_US
dc.subjectcolonic anastomosesen_US
dc.subjectwound healingen_US
dc.subjectcollagenen_US
dc.subjecthydroxyprolineen_US
dc.subjectbreaking strengthen_US
dc.subjectraten_US
dc.titleComparison of electromagnetic field stimulation on the healing of small and large intestinal anastomosesen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Comparison of electromagnetic field stimulation on the healing of small and large intestinal anastomoses.pdf
Boyut:
1.13 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu