A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Omer
dc.contributor.authorDane, Asim
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Eren
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:16:06Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:16:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption (PIR) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiography and to compare the findings of these imaging techniques.Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 733 patients who had at least one unerupted tooth and had undergoneimaging with both three-dimensional (3D) CBCT and two-dimensional (2D) panoramic radiography. In all the images, the number of teeth with intracoronal resorption, affected tooth type and number, and size and location of the PIR defects were recorded. The McNemar test was used to compare the prevalence of PIR in the CBCT and panoramic images.Results: Fewer PIR defects were detected in the panoramic images (3.1% of the patients) than in the CBCT images (9.5% of the patients) (p<.001). According to the CBCT images, the distribution of PIR defects was as follows: third molars (59.5%), canine teeth (11.4%), second molars and premolars (7.6% for both), supernumerary teeth (5.1%), second molars (3.8%), central incisors (2.5%), and first premolar and primary second molar teeth (1.5% for both). According to the scoring classification system for PIR defects, PIR 1 defects were the most common (65.8%), followed by PIR 3 (24.1%) and PIR 2 (10.1%). Of these defects, 69.6% were located in the central aspect of the crown. Ectopically positioned teeth showing intracoronal resorption accounted for 51.9% of the cases of PIR.Conclusions: CBCT detected more cases of PIR than panoramic radiography. The mandibular third permanent molar was the most commonly affected tooth.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00016357.2016.1235227
dc.identifier.endpage641en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27669814
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84988698027
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage636en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1235227
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6420
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000387273100009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Odontologica Scandinavica
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectintracoronal resorptionen_US
dc.subjectpanoramic radiographyen_US
dc.subjectpre-eruptiveen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorptionen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption.pdf
Boyut:
1.24 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu