Which is more effective for pain relief during fractionated carbon dioxide laser treatment: EMLA cream or forced cold air anesthesia?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSari, Elif
dc.contributor.authorBakar, Bulent
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:30:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionBAKAR, BULENT/0000-0002-6236-7647
dc.description.abstractBackground and aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream and forced cold air anesthesia (FCAA) on pain control during ablative fractionated carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment. Methods: Fifteen volunteers participated in this prospective, controlled, split-face clinical study. EMLA cream was applied 60minutes before the laser procedure on half of the face, and FCAA was performed on each subunit of the other half of the face. The laser procedure was performed on each half of the face. Patients rated their pain during the procedure using a pain scale scored from 0-10. Both doctor and nurse rated patient discomfort during the procedure using a scale scored from 0-10. The pain scores associated with both EMLA and FCAA sides of the face were compared statistically. Results: Patient pain scores and discomfort scores detected by doctor and nurse were not statistically different between EMLA and FCAA. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females. Conclusion: Instead of using EMLA, FCAAwhich can be applied in a shorter timemay be a cost-effective, simple, and safe local anesthesia method used in the ablative fractionated CO2 laser procedure.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14764172.2017.1358458
dc.identifier.endpage40en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-4172
dc.identifier.issn1476-4180
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28753078
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029707461
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage34en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1358458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/7590
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000423515100009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Cosmetic And Laser Therapy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEMLAen_US
dc.subjectforced cold airen_US
dc.subjectFractionated carbon dioxide laseren_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.titleWhich is more effective for pain relief during fractionated carbon dioxide laser treatment: EMLA cream or forced cold air anesthesia?en_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Which is more effective for pain relief during fractionated carbon dioxide laser treatment EMLA cream or forced cold air anesthesia.pdf
Boyut:
1.28 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu