Affinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDemirer, S
dc.contributor.authorGecim, IE
dc.contributor.authorAydinuraz, K
dc.contributor.authorAtaoglu, H
dc.contributor.authorYerdel, MA
dc.contributor.authorKuterdem, E
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:34:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:34:50Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionyerdel, mehmet ali/0000-0002-4044-076X
dc.description.abstractBackground. Abdominal wall hernias have always been a major problem for general surgeons. The techniques of repairing primacy, recurrent, and incisional hernias have evolved throughout the years at an accelerating trend, especially after production of prosthetic graft materials. Although looked upon with suspicion due to infection, fistula formation, and foreign body reaction, prosthetic graft materials are used deliberately in primary and recurrent hernias. The present study was,designed to evaluate bacterial adherence to frequently used prosthetic graft materials. Materials and methods. The study was carried out in five different groups with each group consisting of 10 identical samples of the same kind of prosthetic graft material. The prosthetic graft materials used in the study were polypropylene, polyglactin 910, polyester fibers, steel, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). These prosthetic graft materials were incubated in vitro with a Staphylococcus epidermidis strain which was ++++ adhesion positive. The degree of adhesion of S. epidermidis to prosthetic graft materials was assessed by the ELISA. method. Results. Vicryl grafts showed significantly minimal bacterial adhesion whereas PTFE grafts tended to have more adhesion but this did not reach a statistical significance. Other graft materials did not show any difference for bacterial adhesion (Table 3). Conclusion. These results suggest that in vitro S. epidermidis adhesion to Vicryl grafts is less than other types of prosthetic graft materials (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Further in vitro and in vivo studies are required to confirm these results and to understand the complex interactions among bacteria, graft material, microenvironment, and surgical technique. <(c)> 2001 Academic press.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1006/jsre.2000.5981
dc.identifier.endpage74en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4804
dc.identifier.issn1095-8673
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11421606
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034975061
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage70en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.5981
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2921
dc.identifier.volume99en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000169838100010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Surgical Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectprosthetic graft materialsen_US
dc.subjectS. epidermidisen_US
dc.subjectin vitro bacterial adherenceen_US
dc.titleAffinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materialsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Affinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materials.pdf
Boyut:
100.72 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu