Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorArikan, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Hayriye
dc.contributor.authorSari, Saziye
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:17:05Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. The aim of this study was to compare MTA with another base material, IRM, which is generally used on pulpal floor after root canal treatment, regarding their effect on the success of root canal treatment of primary teeth with furcation lesions. Materials and Methods. Fifty primary teeth with furcation lesions were divided into 2 groups. Following root canal treatment, the pulpal floor was coated with MTA in the experimental group and with IRM in the control group. Teeth were followed up considering clinical (pain, pathological mobility, tenderness to percussion and palpation, and any soft tissue pathology and sinus tract) and radiographical (pathological root resorption, reduced size or healing of existing lesion, and absence of new lesions at the interradicular or periapical area) criteria for 18 months. For the statistical analysis, Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square tests were used and a.. value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results. Although there were no statistically significant differences between two groups in terms of treatment success, lesions healed significantly faster in the MTA group. Conclusion. In primary teeth with furcation lesions, usage of MTA on the pulpal floor following root canal treatment can be a better alternative since it induced faster healing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAnkara University Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitAnkara Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Ankara University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArikan, V., Sonmez, H., & Sari, S. (2016). Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions. BioMed research international, 2016, 1429286.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2016/1429286
dc.identifier.issn2314-6133
dc.identifier.issn2314-6141
dc.identifier.pmid27957486
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84998962509
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1429286
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6692
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000388379700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHindawi Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiomed Research International
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesionsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions.pdf
Boyut:
3.64 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu