A Field-Trial Of Two Restorative Materials Used With Atraumatic Restorative Treatment In Rural Turkey: 24-Month Results

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorDülgergil, C. Türksel
dc.contributor.authorSoyman, Mübin
dc.contributor.authorDalli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Işıl
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:48:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:48:22Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionSoyman, Mubin/0000-0001-5747-8783; ERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of high-strength glass ionomer cement (HSGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) in single and multiple surface carious cavities in the field conditions. Material and Methods: A split-mouth design, including ninety-one fillings placed on contra lateral molar pairs of 37 children, was used in permanent dentition. As filling materials, a HSGIC (Ketac Molar/3M ESPE) and a RMGIC (Vitremer/3M ESPE) were used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Baseline and 6, 12 and 24-month evaluations of the fillings were made with standard-ART and USPHS criteria by two examiners with kappa values of 0.92 and 0.87 for both criteria. Results: According to the USPHS criteria, the retention rates of RMGIC and HSGIC restorations were 100% and 80.9% for single surface, and 100% and 41.2% for multiple surface restorations after 24 months, respectively. Irrespective of surface number, RMGIC was significantly superior to HSGIC (p=0.004), according to both standard-ART and USPHS criteria. Conclusion: The results indicate that RMGIC may be an alternative restorative technique in comparison to high-strength GIC applications in ART-field-trials. However, further clinical and field trials are needed to support this conclusion.en_US
dc.identifier.citationErcan, E., Dülgergil, C. T., Soyman, M., Dalli, M., & Yildirim, I. (2009). A field-trial of two restorative materials used with atraumatic restorative treatment in rural Turkey: 24-month results. Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 17(4), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572009000400008en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572009000400008
dc.identifier.endpage314en_US
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19668990
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-69249135438
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000400008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4423
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269124200008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniv Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauruen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtraumatic Restorative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectARTen_US
dc.subjectGlass-ionomer cementsen_US
dc.subjectResin-modified glass-ionomeren_US
dc.subjectLight Emitted Diode (LED)en_US
dc.titleA Field-Trial Of Two Restorative Materials Used With Atraumatic Restorative Treatment In Rural Turkey: 24-Month Resultsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
A Field-Trial Of Two Restorative Materials Used With Atraumatic Restorative Treatment In Rural Turkey 24-Month Results.pdf
Boyut:
107.29 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu