Duration of ultrasonic activation causing secondary fractures during the removal of the separated instruments with different tapers

dc.contributor.authorArslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Ezgi Doganay
dc.contributor.authorTas, Gizem
dc.contributor.authorAkbiyik, Nuray
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu, Huseyin Sinan
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T18:11:08Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T18:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentKKÜ
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of taper (.08, .06, and .04) of separated K3XF instruments on duration taken for the secondary fracture formation during ultrasonic activation. Materials and methods Ten 25/.08 K3XF (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), ten 25/.06 K3XF, and ten 25/.04 K3XF instruments were used for the study. The apical 5 mm of the instruments was cut to simulate the fragments in root canals. Fragments of the instruments were sandwiched between two straight dentin blocks. An ultrasonic tip was used to cause a secondary fracture of the fragment. The time needed for the secondary fracture was recorded for each instrument. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test (alpha = 0.05). Results Secondary fractures occurred in all instruments. In the .08 taper group, secondary fractures took longer than in the case of the .06 and the .04 taper groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the .06 and the .04 taper groups in terms of the time required for the occurrence of a secondary fracture (P > 0.05). Conclusions In the .08 taper group, secondary fracture took longer time than in the case of the .06 and the .04 taper groups due to its larger cross-sectional area involved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArslan, H., Doğanay Yıldız, E., Taş, G. et al. (2020). Duration of ultrasonic activation causing secondary fractures during the removal of the separated instruments with different tapers. Clin Oral Invest 24, 351–355.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-019-02936-7
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31102046
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066034847
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage351en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02936-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/12894
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000513239100036
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectK3XFen_US
dc.subjectNickel titaniumen_US
dc.subjectSecondary fractureen_US
dc.subjectSeparated fileen_US
dc.subjectTaperen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonicsen_US
dc.titleDuration of ultrasonic activation causing secondary fractures during the removal of the separated instruments with different tapersen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Arslan2020_Article_DurationOfUltrasonicActivation.pdf
Boyut:
301.01 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text