The color differences of direct esthetic restorative materials after setting and compared with a shade guide

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBarutcigil, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorHarorli, Osman Tolga
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorBayindir, Funda
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:51:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionharorli, osman tolga/0000-0001-6828-5063; Barutcugil, Cagatay/0000-0002-5321-2299; BAYINDIR, FUNDA/0000-0001-5699-2879
dc.description.abstractBackground. The authors conducted a study to evaluate esthetic restorative materials' color differences after setting and color matching between set materials and a shade guide. Materials and Methods. The authors evaluated 13 resin-based composites, one silorane-based composite, two polyacid-modified resin composites and one conventional glass ionomer cement. They measured the color parameters of the samples, which were 8 millimeters in diameter and 1 5 mm in thickness, before and after they were set according to the Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE) L*a*b* color scale relative to standard illumination against a white background by means of a dental colorimeter. They also compared the final colors of the restorative materials with a shade guide. Results. Color difference values for each restorative material ranged from 3.25 to 14.04. With the exception of Fuji IX (GC, Tokyo), Filtek P60 (3M ESPE) and Te-Econom (Ivoclar Vivadent), the restorative materials exhibited a perceptible color change after setting. Color difference values between the set materials and the shade guide tabs ranged from 1.86 to 11.83. With the exception of Filtek Supreme XT (3M ESPE) and Fuji IX, the materials exhibited a perceptible difference. Conclusion. Most of the materials tested exhibited a significant color change after polymerization and did not match the shade guide tab after undergoing light curing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAtaturk University Research FundAtaturk University [2003/158]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported partially by Ataturk University Research Fund (project 2003/158).en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0249
dc.identifier.endpage665en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177
dc.identifier.issn1943-4723
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21628688
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79960100857
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage658en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0249
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4989
dc.identifier.volume142en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000291844800019
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmer Dental Assocen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of The American Dental Association
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectColor perceptionen_US
dc.subjectdental materialsen_US
dc.subjectshade guidesen_US
dc.titleThe color differences of direct esthetic restorative materials after setting and compared with a shade guideen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
The color differences of direct esthetic restorative materials after setting and compared with a shade guide.pdf
Boyut:
334.71 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu