A Comparison of the Low-Level Laser Versus Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on New Bone Formed Through Distraction Osteogenesis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKoçyiğit, İsmail Doruk
dc.contributor.authorCoşkunses, Fatih Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorPala, Elvan
dc.contributor.authorTuğcu, Funda
dc.contributor.authorÖnder, Ercüment
dc.contributor.authorMocan, Asriye
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:06:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionOnder, M Ercument/0000-0002-1488-616X
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess and compare the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of bone formed through distraction osteogenesis (DO) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Background data: LIPUS and LLLT are noninvasive supporting treatment concepts used for wound healing. LIPUS has been used to accelerate bone healing through the therapeutic effect arising from piezoelectric and angiogenetic effects on cell membranes. LLLT known as "photobiomodulation'' is used in the treatment of soft and hard tissue injuries. Methods: The study was conducted with 15 New Zealand rabbits randomly divided into three groups of 5 according to treatment, as follows: Group A: DO was performed with no further treatment; Group B: DO was performed followed by 30mW/cm(2) LIPUS at 1 Mhz for 20 min/day during the distraction period; Group C: DO was performed followed by 25mW/cm(2) LLLT at 650 nm for 10 min/day during the distraction period. DEXA was used to examine the treated areas prior to surgery and at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Results: In the control group, the mean BMD values at both 30 and 60 days postoperatively were below the baseline level, whereas they were above at the same time intervals in the LIPUS group. In the LLLT group, the mean BMD value at 30 days postoperatively was below the baseline level, whereas it was above the baseline level at 60 days postoperatively. Conclusions: LIPUS and LLLT applied during the distraction period accelerated the DO treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2012.3263
dc.identifier.endpage443en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22779421
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84864957490
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage438en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2012.3263
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5226
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307454100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine And Laser Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of the Low-Level Laser Versus Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on New Bone Formed Through Distraction Osteogenesisen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
A Comparison of the Low-Level Laser Versus Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on New Bone Formed Through Distraction Osteogenesis.pdf
Boyut:
319.23 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu