Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Surgery in Radicular Cyst Enucleation

dc.contributor.authorKocyigit, Ismail Doruk
dc.contributor.authorAtil, Fethi
dc.contributor.authorAlp, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Umut
dc.contributor.authorTuz, Hakan H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:52:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionATIL, Fethi/0000-0002-8286-4819
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study compared the use of piezosurgery and conventional surgery in radicular cyst enucleation. Study Design: The study was conducted with 29 patients who were radiologically and cytologically prediagnosed with radicular cysts in the jaw region. Nineteen patients were treated using piezosurgery, and 10 were treated using conventional surgical procedures. Surgical procedures were evaluated according to the following criteria: hemorrhage, soft-tissue damage, manipulation complexity, major perforation areas on the enucleated cyst tissue, and approximate operation duration. Patients were monitored postoperatively and evaluated for hemorrhaging at 24, 48, and 72 hours following surgery. Follow-up was conducted to check for recurrences and ranged from 5 to 24 months. Results: No complications were observed in any of the 20 patients treated using piezosurgery, although the duration of surgery was longer than expected. Of the 10 patients treated using conventional methods, hemorrhaging that affected the operation occurred in 3 cases, perforation of the cyst epithelium and difficulties in enucleation occurred in 5 cases, postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 2 cases, and recurrence was observed in 2 cases. Conclusions: Piezosurgery may be considered effective in procedures such as enucleation that require sensitive manipulation, despite the increase in the length of the overall surgical procedure. Given the results of the present study and the current lack of information in the literature regarding postoperative pain, infection, and long-term success rates associated with the use of piezosurgery in cyst enucleation, further study in this area is recommended.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e318271014c
dc.identifier.endpage1808en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23147343
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873298597
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1805en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318271014c
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5165
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000311889300108
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCysten_US
dc.subjectpiezosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectrecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectconventionalen_US
dc.subjectmanipulationen_US
dc.titlePiezosurgery Versus Conventional Surgery in Radicular Cyst Enucleationen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Surgery in Radicular Cyst Enucleation.pdf
Boyut:
320.47 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text