Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUzgur, Recep
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorUzgur, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorColak, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:29:35Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionColak, Hakan/0000-0001-8262-0913; Ozcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate the marginal and internal cement thicknesses of inlay restorations made of various CAD/CAM materials using 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) technique. Materials and MethodsCaries-free extracted mandibular molars (N = 30) with similar size were randomly assigned to three groups (N = 10 per group). Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared, and inlay restorations were obtained by milling out CAD/CAM materials namely, (a) IPS: monolithic lithium disilicate (control), (b) VE: polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and (c) CS: nano-ceramic using a CAM unit. Marginal and internal cement thicknesses were measured using 3D micro-CT. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (alpha = 0.05). ResultsThe mean marginal and internal cement thickness were not significant in all inlay materials (p > 0.05). Mean marginal cement thickness (m) was the lowest for the IPS group (67.54 10.16) followed by VE (84.09 3.94) and CS (95.18 +/- 10.58) (p > 0.05). The internal cement thickness (m) was the lowest in the CS group (54.85 +/- 6.94) followed by IPS (60.58 +/- 9.22) and VE (77.53 +/- 12.13) (p > 0.05). ConclusionMarginal and internal cement thicknesses of MOD inlays made of monolithic lithium disilicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and nano-ceramic CAD/CAM materials were similar and all less than 100 m, which could be considered clinically acceptable. Clinical significanceMOD inlays made of different CAD/CAM materials presented similar cement thickness, less than 100 m.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKirikkale University, Research Center, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Kirikkale University, Research Center, Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.12521
dc.identifier.endpage460en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27517616
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84981331787
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/7382
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000435265200010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic And Reconstructive Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAMen_US
dc.subjectcement thicknessen_US
dc.subjectmicro-CTen_US
dc.titleCement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.pdf
Boyut:
268.41 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu