Comparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Model

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCimen, Emre
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Mustafa Ercument
dc.contributor.authorCambazoglu, Mine
dc.contributor.authorBirant, Emir
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:16:26Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionOnder, M Ercument/0000-0002-1488-616X
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this in vivo study is to compare the single-titanium, double-titanium mini plate, and single resorbable plate systems used in internal rigid fixation of the unilateral mandibular condylar fractures on new design biomechanical model. Methods: Thirty synthetic polyurethane models were used for biomechanical testing. Fracture lines were created for each model. Fragments were fixed with single-titanium plates in Group A (n = 10), double-titanium plates in Group B (n = 10), and single biodegradable plate (PPLA) in Group C (n = 10). Masticatory forces were applied to the models and the biomechanical properties of the titanium plate and screws, resorbable plate, and screws were evaluated. Results: The average failure force for Group A, Group B, and Group C is 199, 324, 177N and the average bone displacement for Group A, Group B, Group C is 1.9, 0.3, 2.1 mm, respectively. Discussion: Double titanium plates showed the most acceptable results in the fixation of unilateral subcondylar fractures where the single titanium and biodegradable plate systems failed to provide enough stability in unilateral subcondylar fracture fixation. Biodegradable plate systems are still not an alternative in fixation of unilateral condylar fractures.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002754
dc.identifier.endpage1281en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27315307
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84975148348
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1277en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002754
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6528
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000379793500073
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanical testen_US
dc.subjectcondylar fractureen_US
dc.subjectdouble mini plate fixationen_US
dc.subjectresorbable plate fixationen_US
dc.subjectsingle-titanium mini plate fixationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Modelen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Comparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Model.pdf
Boyut:
284.92 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu