The Effects of Scapular Mobilization in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAytar, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorBaltaci, Gul
dc.contributor.authorUhl, Tim
dc.contributor.authorTuzun, Handan
dc.contributor.authorOztop, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:13:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionBaltaci, Gul/0000-0002-6513-2499; Uhl, Tim/0000-0001-9868-417X
dc.description.abstractTo determine the effects of scapular mobilization on function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: University hospital clinics in Turkey. Participants: 66 participants (mean +/- SD age 52.06 +/- 3.71 y) with SAIS. Interventions: Participants were randomized into 3 groups: scapular mobilization, sham scapular mobilization, and supervised exercise. Before the interventions transcutaneous electrical stimulation and hot pack were applied to all groups. Total intervention duration for all groups was 3 wk with a total of 9 treatment sessions. Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder function and pain intensity were primary outcome measures; range of motion and participant satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Shoulder function was assessed with the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain severity. Active range of motion was measured with a universal goniometer. A 7-point Likert scale was used to evaluate satisfaction. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, before visits 5 and 10, 4 wk after visit 9, and 8 wk after visit 9. Results: There was no group difference for DASH score (P = .75), pain at rest (P = .41), pain with activity (P = .45), pain at night (P = .74), and shoulder flexion (P = .65), external rotation (P = .63), and internal rotation (P = .19). There was a significant increase in shoulder motion and function and a significant decrease in pain across time when all groups were combined (P < .001). The level of satisfaction was not significantly different for any of the questions about participant satisfaction between all groups (P > .05). Conclusion: There was not a significant advantage of scapular mobilization for shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction compared with sham or supervised-exercise groups in patients with SAIS.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/jsr.2013-0120
dc.identifier.endpage129en_US
dc.identifier.issn1056-6716
dc.identifier.issn1543-3072
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25054347
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930249863
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage116en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2013-0120
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6170
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000355269200006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics Publ Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Sport Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectshoulderen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectfunctionen_US
dc.subjectsatisfactionen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Scapular Mobilization in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu