Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCil, Aylin P.
dc.contributor.authorSeli, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:07:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose of review To delineate the current trends in the clinical application of oocyte cryopreservation. Recent findings Although the first live birth from oocyte cryopreservation was reported approximately three decades ago, significant improvement in the clinical application of oocyte cryopreservation took place only over the past decade. On the basis of the available evidence suggesting that success rates with donor oocyte vitrification are similar to that of IVF with fresh donor oocytes, the American Society of Reproductive Medicine has recently stated that oocyte cryopreservation should no longer be considered experimental for medical indications, outlying elective oocyte cryopreservation. Meanwhile, a few surveys on the attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation revealed that elective use for the postponement of fertility is currently the most common indication for oocyte cryopreservation. Most recently, a randomized controlled trial revealed important evidence on the safety of nondonor oocyte cryopreservation, and confirmed that the clinical success of vitrification is comparable to that of IVF with fresh oocytes. Summary The evidence suggesting similar IVF success rates with both donor and nondonor cryopreserved oocytes compared with fresh oocytes will increase the utilization of elective oocyte cryopreservation. Appropriate counseling of women for oocyte cryopreservation requires the establishment of age-based clinical success rates with cryopreserved oocytes for various indications.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Health (NIH)United States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA [R01HD059909]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipE.S. is supported by Award R01HD059909 from the National Institute of Health (NIH). The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH. There are no conflicts of interest.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCil, A. P., & Seli, E. (2013). Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 25(3), 247–254.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/GCO.0b013e32836091f4
dc.identifier.endpage254en_US
dc.identifier.issn1040-872X
dc.identifier.issn1473-656X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23562954
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84877790439
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage247en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32836091f4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5525
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000318752000012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Opinion In Obstetrics & Gynecology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectelective oocyte cryopreservationen_US
dc.subjectfertility preservationen_US
dc.subjectoocyte cryopreservationen_US
dc.subjectslow freezingen_US
dc.subjectvitrificationen_US
dc.titleCurrent trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservationen_US
dc.typeReview Article

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation.pdf
Boyut:
190.61 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diğer Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu