Assessment of antibacterial activity of EndoREZ

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Ünverdi
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.contributor.authorHadimli, Hasan Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.contributor.authorErganis, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:43:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description4th World Workshop on Oral Medicine -- APR 30-MAY 03, 2006 -- San Juan, PR
dc.descriptionErdemir, Ali/0000-0002-6489-9620; Erdemir, Ali/0000-0003-1140-3887
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate antibacterial activity of a new resin based sealer, EndoREZ in comparison with 5 other sealers: AH 26, Diaket, Sultan, Apexit, and RoekoSeal. Study design. The effect of 6 different sealers oil the growth of 3 bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was measured using the agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). For ADT, 200 mu L bacterial suspensions were spread oil agar plates and freshly mixed sealers were applied to uniform wells punched in the agar. The zones of inhibition of bacterial growth were measured at 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, and 10 days. For DCT, 2 sets of sealers were prepared: fresh and 24-hour samples. Fresh samples were used within 20 minutes of mixing time while 24-hour samples were allowed to set it) a humid atmosphere at 37 degrees C for 24 hours before testing. Sealers were mixed and placed oil the walls of microliter plate wells and 10-mu L bacterial Suspensions were allowed to directly contact the sealers for I hour. Fresh media were added and 15 mu L were transferred from this plate to another plate containing fresh medium (215 mu L). Bacterial growth of this last plate was then measured using spectrophotometer every hour over 16 hours. Results. ADT results indicated that EndoREZ, Apexit, and RoekoSeal did not show any, antibacterial activity. In DCT results, AH 26 and Sultan were potent bacterial growth inhibitors. Conclusion. EndoREZ is not as potent a bacterial growth inhibitor as Sultan and AH 26.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmer Acad Oral Meden_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.017
dc.identifier.endpage126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.issn1528-395X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16831684
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745754912
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/3757
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000239158800021
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology And Endodontology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleAssessment of antibacterial activity of EndoREZen_US
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
1-s2.0-S1079210405005469-main.pdf
Boyut:
173.45 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu