Comparison of Retention Rates of Fissure Sealants Using Two Flowable Restorative Materials and a Conventional Resin Sealant: Two-Year Follow-Up

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOba, Aylin Akbay
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Isil Saroglu
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorDulgergil, Turksel
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:06:48Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553; sonmez, isil/0000-0002-3530-0244
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the retention rates of two flowable restorative systems (Admira Flow and Grandio Flow) with that of a conventional resin-based sealant (Fissurit F). Materials and Methods: The study was planned as a clinical trial with a split-mouth design. A total of 122 sealants (38 Admira Flow, 41 Grandio Flow, 43 Fissurit F) were randomly applied to completely erupted permanent molars in 35 patients aged 9-20 years and followed up for 24 months. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi(2) and multiple comparison tests. Results: At the end of the follow-up period, Fissurit F had higher retention rates (81.0%) than both Admira Flow (60.5%) and Grandio Flow (57.1%), with p < 0.05. However, there was no significant difference in caries development among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The two flowable composite resin materials used as fissure sealant were less retentive than the conventional resin sealant. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.identifier.citationAylin Akbay Oba, Işıl Şaroğlu Sönmez, Ertuğrul Ercan, Türksel Dülgergil; Comparison of Retention Rates of Fissure Sealants Using Two Flowable Restorative Materials and a Conventional Resin Sealant: Two-Year Follow-Up. Med Princ Pract 1 April 2012; 21 (3): 234–237.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000333561
dc.identifier.endpage237en_US
dc.identifier.issn1011-7571
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22156663
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84859582965
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage234en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000333561
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5363
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000305799100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Principles And Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFlowable compositeen_US
dc.subjectRetentionen_US
dc.subjectFissure sealanten_US
dc.titleComparison of Retention Rates of Fissure Sealants Using Two Flowable Restorative Materials and a Conventional Resin Sealant: Two-Year Follow-Upen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of Retention Rates of Fissure Sealants Using Two Flowable Restorative Materials and a Conventional Resin Sealant Two-Year Follow-Up.pdf
Boyut:
144.05 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu