Effects of Different Chlorhexidine Formulations on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇatalbaş, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGelgör, İbrahim Erhan
dc.contributor.authorZorba, Yahya Orcun
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:48:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionErdemir, Ali/0000-0003-1140-3887; Erdemir, Ali/0000-0002-6489-9620; ERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553; Gelgor, I. Erhan/0000-0003-0859-9874
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the hypothesis that the application of different chlorhexidine formulations to the etched enamel will not affect shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and Methods: Forty-four freshly extracted human premolars; were collected and stored in distilled water. The teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric and were rinsed and dried. The teeth then were divided into four equal groups. While Group 1 served as a control, Groups 2 to 4 were treated before bonding with a chlorhexidine formulation that included solution (2%), gel (1%), and mouthwash (0.2%). Orthodontic brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Bond strength results were evaluated with the use of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < .05) and post hoc tests. Modes of failures were verified by means of scanning electron microscopy. Results: Although no statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 4 (P > .05), both were statistically superior to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). In this in vitro study, the observed measures for Groups 2 and 3 (14.5-10.6 MPa) were lower than those for Groups 1 and 4 (27.3-24.9 MPa), but these values were much higher than those required for clinical use (6-8 MPa). Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The application of chlorhexidine mouth rinse before bonding had no significant effect on the SBS value, and the application of chlorhexidine solution and gel significantly decreased SBS. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:312-316.)en_US
dc.identifier.citationCatalbas, B., Ercan, E., Erdemir, A., Gelgor, I. E., & Zorba, Y. O. (2009). Effects of different chlorhexidine formulations on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. The Angle orthodontist, 79(2), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.2319/032008-158.1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/032008-158.1
dc.identifier.endpage316en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19216606
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-63049119736
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/032008-158.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4488
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000263855600018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontist
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectShear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic bracketen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidine gelen_US
dc.subjectARI scoreen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Chlorhexidine Formulations on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
032008-158_1.pdf
Boyut:
285.43 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu